Martin is right actually, Heave's $13M funding, and previewing our October conference
Martin is stating the obvious - the optimal seed strategy is to be non-consensus at seed but have the portfolio company attain consensus by the time it reaches Series A. Why is this controversial?
Martin is stating the obvious - the optimal seed strategy is to be non-consensus at seed but have the portfolio company attain consensus by the time it reaches Series A. Why is this controversial?